Transparency: Would You Be Different If Everyone Was Watching.

I was accused of being “shady” once by another Realtor.  It got to me.  I was doing the Mike Ferry thing, and calling people for listings (this was before I knew who the heck MF was).   I was calling targeted neighborhoods when I had buyers.  “I have a buyer–do you know sellers.”   I got listings out of it (because the rule of thumb: the more people you talk to, the more listings you get).  This is when I was in my mid 20′s.  Anyway, apparently someone else had talked to someone I happened to call.  It was instantly assumed that I played dirty pool.  I was the new agent in the office, and Agents (salespeople, really) are high drama types.

Faster than the Internet turned on Greg Swann, I was an outcast.

I was stealing clients, a cardinal sin in a Real Estate Office.  I had–as a new licensee–11 or 12 listings really quickly.  This was novel, and people had a target on me. 

I was also keeping my method of client acquisition secret.  I’d made some gaffes in my new arrival as a RE/MAX agent, and the non producing majority was jealous, and looking for an excuse.  I figured if I let the cat out of the bag that you could call clients and get business then everyone would do it.  I thought that me pulling a list of people to call, scrubbing it against the DNC, calling it, making friends, listing their houses and making sales was easy.  Push marketing works, kids.

Anyway, the mistrust the incident had fostered made it literally difficult for me to work in my office.  My lack of skill at handling it compounded it.  After all–how could I have made this happen if not via crooked methods?  How could I get 11 listings in my first month with a brokerage without spending any money on advertising?

That’s when I learned…

Transparency Creates Trust.

A thought occurred to me: it was then hard (as it is now) to prospect for business.  I could show my methods, and people wouldn’t copy me.  Because few people would have the reserves to wade through the ‘nos’ to get to a yes.  So the offending agent, I took into my office a while later.  I said, “we had a misunderstanding, and for my part, I am sorry that I called a client you were working on–I never meant for that to happen.  I wanted to show you how I came across the number.”

Then I showed him my excel file, the calls that I’d made, and the notes that I’d taken.  He saw that my guy was just part of a list.  He didn’t have the mea culpa that I wanted, but he came to respect what I was doing to get business.  He didn’t pursue me from that point–he knew it was an honest mistake.  I invited anyone else to start hearing about what I was doing to gain business.  It wasn’t really a freak coincidence; I’d pulled a well targeted list, and was calling on people likely to close. 

So from that moment, I didn’t hide any of my methodologies, and I learned (though I didn’t have the name for it) that Transparency was really important.  Because information desires to be free, there can normally be few secrets or long term competitive advantages.  And, even if you told everyone every nuance of your business plan, a pale echo of what you’re doing is never going to threaten you.  You can’t replicate passion, soul, verve, moxie, desire, love by following a script.  As Scott Ginsberg said–there are no cover bands in the rock and roll hall of fame.

 

OH, By the way:  Monday I should have the my header done.  I learned an absolute TON about photoshop from “You Suck at Photoshop” so Thanks Lani via Bloodhound Blog.  It’s fun to do stuff like this, and it builds more skill than playing DTD

And In Case You Missed it:

April Rocks

So Do Todd And The Radical

Athol Kay Shows He has a Big Beating Heart behind all the pith and mirth.

Finally Ben Folds, Iron and Wine and The Postal Service all rock.  But Ben Folds?  All of his covers rock.  He could be the only cover band in the hall of fame.

10 Responses to Transparency: Would You Be Different If Everyone Was Watching.
  1. Greg Swann
    February 22, 2008 | 4:40 pm

    > Faster than the Internet turned on Greg Swann, I was an outcast.

    That’s a good joke, an excellent example of a satiric jab. But you seem like a decent guy, so I’ll let you in on the news: We’re having the second best week in our history. Last week was the best, so far. Has nothing to do with six dozen Deeply Offended webloggers picking each other scabs. We’re the biggest because we’re the best. Will that change in the future? You bet. We’ll be bigger.

    My best to you. For what it’s worth, I think the ads might cost you more in credibility than they’re worth in cash. I’ll be sending you a bill for two cents.

  2. [...] Transparency: Would You Be Different If Everyone Was Watching., by Chris Johnson. [...]

  3. chris
    February 22, 2008 | 4:50 pm

    Greg Swann »

    The gist of the problem was the same. I watched in befuddlement as you couldn’t tolerate an obviously apocryphal story…that the well meaning Tony passed on. Then I watched in befuddlement as the internet coudln’t tolerate anything with any flavor. Too saccherine, too salty, meh. I see now why mcDonalds sells…flavorless rules.

    Agreed on the ads. Was biased against before, tried for the hell of it. Was a two week trial more as proof of concept. I don’t think I’ll give it week 2…but I can only spend so much time on this blog.

  4. Greg Swann
    February 22, 2008 | 7:54 pm

    Got it. First rate cover acts: Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, the young Rod Stewart, Cowboy Junkies. I can think of others.

  5. Athol Kay
    February 22, 2008 | 7:59 pm

    For what it’s worth I just had the best two weeks of traffic as well and I slept through the most recent blow out. I suspect that the LA Times link love is the common denomiator for Greg and myself though, which is enjoyable but ultimately largely not a routine thing.

    Thanks for the link love and kind words on that post I did on Reagent. I appreciate it.

  6. chris
    February 22, 2008 | 8:01 pm

    Funny the rod stewart qualifier. The early Beatles, Little Richard, etc, etc. With ya. Really though…we use language to make a point, and neither you nor I can be accused of having ‘foolish consistency,’ right Greg?

  7. chris
    February 22, 2008 | 8:04 pm

    I’m getting an absolute ton (for me) because of the CRM reviews I did. I’m still getting 150 hits/day on searches. Anyhow….

  8. Greg Swann
    February 22, 2008 | 10:55 pm

    > Funny the rod stewart qualifier.

    All I meant was that, later, although the man was even more of a cover act, he was a lot less interesting. Those three, though, Jimi, Janis and Rod, could make anything their own. In that sense, their versions don’t even qualify as covers. As with Gary Jules’ cover of “Mad World,” if you eclipse the original, you are the original.

    Traffic: I wasn’t aware of anything from the LA Times. We’ve been surging since the start of the year. I read it as practitioners honing their skills.

  9. chris
    February 23, 2008 | 12:44 am

    Greg Swann »

    Heh. You are a piece of work. And I don’t necessarily mean that in a bad way. I’d go with Joe Cocker, as long as I don’t have to look at him.

    The cover bands comment was more in jest than anything. I agree–originality is overrated. And, improving on an existing idea is valuable.

    I’d like to think RE practitioners are trying to stay relevant–and they could do worse than BHB.

    I’m just tired of pale echoes, marginal thought, mediocre heroes, and ‘nice people’ that are bland and just like everyone else. I

  10. Friday Feed Bag
    March 1, 2008 | 12:41 pm

    [...] a couple of posts from this weeks offerings. 9 Rules For Getting Along On The RE.NET and Transparency: Would You Be Different If Everyone Was Watching. Pretty much the best new RE.net voice I’ve heard for a while. I specially like his [...]

Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://genuinechris.com/transparency-would-you-be-different-if-everyone-was-watching/trackback/

Subscribe without commenting